Virtues of Coin Clubs

I did something fun last night. I was asked to speak in front of a local coin club. Randy Clark, the President of the South King County Coin Club, asked me to make a presentation to his group. The meeting was held at the Tukwila Convention Center which is a few miles south of Sea-Tac airport. The facility is extremely nice and I was encouraged when Randy told me that the meeting usually attracted thirty to forty collectors. With very cold weather and impending snow on the horizon, the actual number of attendees turned out to be less. I counted around twenty people in the crowd; not including my wife who I dragged along for moral support and who I figured could be a ringer in case no one in the crowd had any questions. (Mary: “So what are some of the most interesting coins you’ve sold…”)

The meeting turned out to be a success. It lasted for close to two hours and I was encouraged that the crowd was knowledgeable and enthusiastic. While very few people in the club collected United States gold coins, they asked me some really interesting questions about grading, the price of gold and silver, toning, the market acceptability of “conservation” and more.

Coin clubs are an excellent place for new collectors to share knowledge and improve their education. As a national dealer I often forget about the grass roots of numismatics and that not everyone is necessarily interested in buying Condition Census New Orleans coins. Most collectors start small and as they become more confident because their knowledge is increasing, they buy more expensive coins.

If you are a new collector, go to a local coin club meeting and see if you like it. If you are an experienced collector or dealer, give a little of your time once or twice a year and help the local club. It’s a win-win situation for everyone.

The Ten Most Undervalued New Orleans Gold Coins

It is my belief that many gold coins from the New Orleans mint are undervalued. For the sake of brevity, I am going to focus on what I feel are the ten most undervalued issues. Had I wanted to, I could have made this a list of twenty or even twenty-five coins. More information on these coins (and on all other New Orleans gold issues) will be available in my forthcoming book “Gold Coins of the New Orleans Mint, 1838-1909.” Please check back for more information regarding the availability of this book.

1. 1850-O Gold Dollar

The short-lived gold dollar denomination offers the collector some good overall value. This is the only pre-Civil War New Orleans gold that can be purchased in Uncirculated grades for less than $1,000. The 1850-O has always been my favorite date in the series. It has the lowest original mintage figure (14,000 coins) and is rare in Uncirculated with around two dozen known. Interestingly, this is a scarcer coin in MS63 or MS64 than the heralded 1855-O but it is priced considerably less. A smart collector would do well to put away nice MS61 and MS62 1850-O gold dollars at current levels (under $5,000).

2. 1845-O Quarter Eagle

The 1845-O is the unquestioned key of the New Orleans quarter eagle series. Only 4,000 were minted and around 65-75 pieces are known in all grades. In AU, the value of the 1845-O has shot up in the past few years but at less than $10,000 for a nice AU50 to AU53 example, this date seems like good value, especially given the fact that it is the key issue in a short, completable set. The 1845-O becomes extremely scarce in the higher AU grades and I very strongly recommend purchasing this date in any grade as it appears to have considerable upside.

3. 1856-O Quarter Eagle

The 1856-O is the third scarcest New Orleans quarter eagle in AU50 and better. It is still very affordable with nice AU pieces currently selling in the $1,500-3,500 range depending on quality. Unlike some of the other pieces on this list, the 1856-O is an issue that the collector can be particular when deciding what coin to buy. There are enough pieces around in AU that the collector should seek choice, original pieces with good color and luster. In Uncirculated, the 1856-O is extremely rare. I have only seen four to six in Uncirculated and none better than MS62.

4. 1840-O Half Eagle

The 1840-O half eagle isn’t the rarest coin on this list but it is an issue that I like because of its first-year status. It is not scarce in lower grades but it becomes very hard to find in AU and quite rare in Uncirculated. It has a current Trends value that is considerably lower in MS60 than many more available Charlotte and Dahlonega half eagles of this era and I think it is an excellent value. The Broad Mill variety of this date is extremely scarce in all grades and has the potential to be a key to the New Orleans half eagle series some day if it is better publicized.

5. 1892-O Half Eagle

With Motto half eagles were struck at the New Orleans mint for only three years: 1892, 1893 and 1894. The 1892-O is by far the scarcest of these with an original mintage figure of just 10,000. This date is almost never seen in the lower grades but it is almost never seen above MS60/MS61. You can currently but a nice “slider” in the $2,500-3,500 range and a very decent Uncirculated piece for around $5,000. I think this is extremely reasonable in comparison to other New Orleans half eagles. Did you know that this is the third rarest New Orleans half eagle in terms of overall rarity?

6. 1841-O Eagle

This is among the more expensive coins on this list but I think it is still among the better values. New Orleans didn’t get around to producing their first Eagle until 1841 and then only 2,500 were struck. This date is seldom seen above VF20 to EF40 and most higher grade pieces are very heavily abraded. I don’t think that more than a half dozen AU pieces are known and most of these are in strongly held collections. Figure that a nice EF example is going to cost you $10,000 while an AU—if available—will run in the $20,000 to $30,000. Considering the fact that the 1841-O is the rarest No Motto New Orleans eagle in higher grades, I think these price levels are reasonable.

7. 1852-O Eagle

There are a number of New Orleans eagles struck during the 1850’s that I think are very underrated. I would have to put the 1852-O at the top of the list. It is the fifth rarest of twenty-one No Motto issues from this mint and it is the sixth rarest in higher grades. Despite this coin’s unquestioned rarity, it is still relatively affordable. EF examples still trade in the $3000 range and I recently sold a very nice AU55 for less than $7,000. When one considers that this coin is worth just a bit more than an 1852-O double eagle in the same grade, yet is many times scarcer, I think it is a great value. And don’t get me started about this coin in Uncirculated…

8. 1856-O Eagle

As much as I like the 1852-O eagle, I like the 1856-O even more. It is tied for fourth rarest New Orleans eagle in high grades but it is typically ignored by everyone other than specialists when offered for sale. There were 14,500 of which an estimated 80-90 are known today. I doubt if more than 14-18 are known in AU and in Uncirculated the 1856-O is unique. If higher grade pieces are out of your price range, consider an EF. There are around two dozen known in this range but prices are still under $4,000. I have tried to buy every single 1856-O eagle I could find in the past three to five years and I’m not sure that I’ve owned more than four or five pieces.

9. 1899-O Eagle

The 1899-O is the rarest eagle struck at the New Orleans mint after 1883. Unlike many of the issues from the 1890’s and early 1900’s, this date has not been found in large quantities in Europe. The 1899-O is fairly scarce in the lower Uncirculated grades and it becomes very scarce in MS62. Until a few years ago, I was able to buy MS62 examples for under $1,000 which seemed absurdly cheap. Today, this date has doubled in price but I still think it is a good value in MS62 and above. It is the key issue in the “late date” New Orleans eagle series and as this subset becomes more and more popular with collectors, it will bring a nice premium over the more common dates like the 1901-O and the 1903-O.

10. Late Date Eagles in MS64 and Above

In closing, I’m going with a group of coins that is very different than the other issues I have listed. Nearly every No Motto eagle from New Orleans is rare in Uncirculated and most dates are unknown above MS62 to MS63. Small numbers of common dates are known in MS64 and these can still be purchased for under $10,000. These coins are typically very pretty with excellent color and luster. And they are typically very scarce. Even the more common issues from the 20th century have populations of fewer than ten coins in MS64. An MS64 New Orleans eagle sells for a premium of around four times what a generic Liberty Head eagle is worth. Considering it is around fifty to one hundred times rarer makes it a great deal at its current price level.

"Fundamental" vs. "Grade" Rarity

When discussing “rarity” it is important to realize that there are two different types of rarity. These are “fundamental rarity” and “grade rarity.” Fundamental rarity refers to the overall rarity of an issue. A coin like a 1796 No Stars quarter eagle is fundamentally rare in any grade. The value of such a coin is due primarily to its rarity and not its grade. There is a high level of demand for this issue, even in very low grades. If you have a 1796 No Stars quarter eagle that looks like it was run over by a train, someone is still going to buy it.

A coin that is a grade rarity is one that is considered rare solely because of its high grade. A classic example of this is a 1920 Saint Gaudens double eagle. This is a common issue in the lower Uncirculated grades and it is only moderately scarce and desirable in MS63 to MS64. But it is extremely rare in MS65 and there is a dramatic jump in price between MS64 and MS65.

From my personal viewpoint, I like coins that are fundamental rarities. As someone who has a significant amount of money invested in coins (i.e., my inventory) I feel a lot better buying a coin that is considered desirable by virtue of its rarity in any grade than one that is desirable ONLY because of its high grade.

Some coins are “hybrids” which can be considered both fundamental rarities and condition rarities. As an example, a Proof Barber quarter is a relatively scarce coin with most issues having mintages figures below 1,000. Even an Impaired Proof has a degree of collector value. But at what point in the grading continuum does a Proof Barber Quarter morph from a fundamental rarity to a condition rarity? I’m not certain that I know the answer but I do know that once Proofs of this design are graded PR67 or higher, they become less interesting to me.

Another factor to consider is this. What if third-party grading ended tomorrow and slabs no longer had any relevance? In this scenario, a coin like an 1854-D Three Dollar gold piece would still be considered a desirable numismatic item with many potential buyers. But would a PR68 Barber quarter be considered four or five times “better” than a pretty, lightly hairlined piece that had previously been in a PR64 slab? I’m not sure I know the answer but…

These are interesting questions that the collector needs to ponder as he decides what his next purchase will be.

Modern Coin Epiphany

I’ve recently had a bit of an epiphany regarding modern coins. For someone who has traditionally snickered at Walking Liberty half dollars and Mercury Dimes because they were “too new” this isn’t totally unlike the President of Coke admitting that a Pepsi tastes pretty good with a Cheeseburger. Now don’t get to thinking that I really “like” modern coins because I don’t. But the more I look at people collecting moderns, the more I can appreciate the coins and respect the collectors.

I hear “old school” dealers registering the same complaints about modern coins: they are ugly…they are overpriced…they are unsophisticated…the market favors sellers. Let’s look at these points.

Looks: While I personally have a hard time getting excited about the design of a $50 Platinum eagle or a modern commemorative half dollar, I can understand that some people like they way they look. Hey, I love Abstract Expressionist art and a lot of people think it looks like squiggles on a canvas that a cranky three year old drew before his afternoon nap. And, to be honest about it, is a Chain Cent or a Capped Bust Right half dollar a really “beautiful” coin from an aesthetic point of view?

Prices: I think modern coins in super-grades are marginal deals but, you know what, so are many classic issues. If someone told me that they were spending $35,000 on a common date Barber Quarter in Proof-69, I’d suggest that they might be better off spending $5,000 on the same issue in PR67. I feel the same way about modern coins. A modern commemorative half eagle in MS70 at $5,000 is questionable value. The same coin in MS68 at $500 seems like a nice addition to someone’s collection.

Sophistication: From my perspective, I think a Bust Half dollar in AU at $500 is a more interesting, sophisticated coin than a Statue of Liberty $5 commemorative. But this is just my opinion. As “sophisticated” as I think my own tastes are, there are plenty of collectors who would look down their noses at me and my “silly southern gold coins” because they are not as worldly as their Roman Imperial coinage. Until the 1970’s, most Morgan dollar collectors were considered numis-morons and today these collectors are now in the upper echelon of collectordom.

Unfair Market: The modern coin market is a developing entity and it will take time for two-way markets to develop. At this point, EBay and Teletrade must be considered the largest modern coins dealers. No, they don’t offer the warm and fuzzy customer service that Douglas Winter Numismatics does, but most collectors of modern coinage don’t want this “frill.”

I can see modern coinage becoming a more and more viable part of the numismatic marketplace in the coming years. People will start researching these series and serious books will be written. In the meantime, why don’t we “classic coin lovers” and their “modern coin” counterparts just try to get along?

Prooflike Gold Coins

Are Prooflike gold coins an interesting future collecting trend or are they yet another piece of clever marketing hype? Yes and possibly yes. Business strike gold coins are usually frosty or satiny in texture. Occasionally, a group of coins are struck from newly-polished dies and they show reflective surfaces. Such coins are termed as “prooflike” by collectors. There are certain issues, such as gold dollars from the 1870’s and 1880’s and three dollar gold pieces from the same era that are frequently encountered with prooflike surfaces. This is due to the fact that these issues have low mintage figures and most were struck from fresh, new dies.

In the case where most examples of a specific date come prooflike, a coin designated as “prooflike” is, in my opinion, not interesting nor is it worth a premium. The one exception might be in the case where a coin has a very reflective or “deep mirror” surfaces.

Other issues are rarely seen with prooflike surfaces. As an example, a small number of New Orleans eagles from the 1840’s are found with very reflective surfaces.

In the case where only a fraction of examples of a certain date come prooflike, a coin designated as “prooflike” is, in my opinion worth a premium. It can be worth a significant premium if the prooflike surfaces add considerably to the coin’s overall eye appeal.

What about very common coins like 1904 double eagles that are sometimes seen with Prooflike surfaces? In my opinion, if a 1904 double eagle is slightly prooflike or reflective only on one side it is worth no premium. If the coin is very reflective and actually resembles a Proof, then it is worth a premium. This begs the question: exactly how much of a premium? At this point it is hard to say. No one really knows how rare Prooflike coins are, on a relative and absolute basis. As the grading services collect more data from submissions of prooflike gold coins, perhaps it will be possible to know the answer.

My advice on Prooflike gold is to go ahead and buy pieces with very reflective mirror surfaces but just don’t get caught up and pay huge premiums in a market for which value levels are still highly speculative.

Gold Coin Coloration

Why don’t gold coins with great coloration sell for a significant premium as copper, silver and nickel coins with a similar appearance do? On certain types of gold coins, superb natural coloration can sometimes be seen. As an example, some of the high grade gold dollars from the 1870’s and the 1880’s can be found with magnificent rose, orange and green-gold hues. Proof silver type coins from this era with wonderful color traditionally sell for big premiums over pieces with average quality coloration.

I believe that there are a few possible answers to this question.

First of all, many insanely toned silver coins are often very common pieces which are given big premiums solely because of their color. Dramatic multi-colored toning might be the only reason that someone wants to buy an otherwise-mundane coin like a common Peace Dollar or a silver commemorative half dollar. Clever marketers were quick to see that this was the best way to turn a $50 coin into a $10,000 coin. If a big marketing company starting selling MS67 and MS68 gold dollars for a big premium because of their color, their thinking just might catch on with the mainstream.

The second reason has to do with the fact that toning on gold coins tends not to be as visually dramatic as on silver or copper coins. You don’t see gold coins with stunning rings of peripheral blues and reds. But the natural coloration of gold is warm and attractive and most uncleaned pieces are fairly pretty to begin with. In my opinion (and if you disagree please don’t send me an irate email…) the natural appearance of most silver and copper coins just isn’t as pretty as their gold brethren.

It seems to me that superbly toned gold coins are a great market play right now, especially if they can be obtained for just a small premium over “normal” examples. If and when PCGS and NGC start designating eye appeal on their holders (NGC has semi-embraced this concept with the star designation) it will be interesting to see if very pretty gold coins sell for very big premiums.

Duke's Creek Collection of Dahlonega Gold Dollars

In April 2006 Heritage will be auctioning the incomparable Duke's Creek Collection of gold dollars, quarter eagles and three dollar gold pieces. I have been asked to write the descriptions of these coins. In the first part of a two-part series, Douglas Winter Numismatics is proud to present the write-ups of these issues. CONDITION CENSUS 1849-D GOLD DOLLAR

1849-D MS64 NGC. Variety 1-B. Similar reverse die state to that seen on the Duke’s Creek: 1001 coin with a number of cracks on the reverse including a prominent one from the rim past the second S in STATES through this letter and down through the base of ATE in this word to the olive leaves at the left end of the wreath. This is the scarcer of the two varieties known.

This is a nicely struck example of a date that is not often found boldly impressed. The obverse shows a group of raised artifacts between the stars at 8:00 and 9:00 while the reverse has a bold date and mintmark. There is a small amount of weakness on the rear curls behind the ear as is typical for this date. The surfaces display some light old hairlines in the fields and we note one tiny nick on the face of Liberty; a few small marks at the center of the reverse do not readily detract. The luster is frosty and above average for the issue while the surfaces are covered with some orange-gold color. There is a band of contrasting color at the obverse border while some splashes of gold on the reverse enhance the appearance. The eye appeal of this coin is very respectable for the grade and this coin’s balanced appearance between the obverse and the reverse is unusual.

The 1849-D is the most common Dahlonega gold dollar both in terms of overall and high grade rarity. There are an estimated three to four dozen known in Uncirculated with most in the MS60 to MS62 range. In properly graded MS63 this issue is quite scarce and it is rare in MS64. We know of approximately three to five pieces that would grade as such by today’s standards. The Duke’s Creek coin is comparable to Green Pond: 1001 which realized $14,950 in our January 2004 sale.

Ex: Duke’s Creek collection and obtained via private treaty from Hancock and Harwell; earlier ex: Heritage 1996 ANA: 8098 (as PCGS MS64) where it sold for $9,625. Listed in Doug Winter’s Condition Census as tied with a small group of other coins as the fourth finest known 1849-D gold dollar.

FINEST KNOWN 1850-D GOLD DOLLAR GRADED MS64 BY NGC 1850-D NGC MS64. Variety 2-C. The only variety of this year. Very early die state with minimal die clashing. Perfect dies.

While coins such as the 1855-D and 1861-D will garner more attention in the, I personally feel that this 1850-D is among the most important gold dollars in the Duke’s Creek collection. It is easily the finest known and it is remarkable for its sharpness of strike and high quality planchet.

The 1850-D is not typically found with a sharp strike but this piece is almost fully defined at the centers and very strong at the borders as well. I can not recall having seen another that showed detail which was comparable to the Duke’s Creek example and this is one of just a handful of pieces known that is not weak on the LLA in DOLLAR.

The surfaces are very clean with a few insignificant ticks seen in the obverse fields and one old, thin scratch that runs down from the ear to the throat. The reverse is nearly perfect and shows just a few light clashmarks as made. In fact, viewed on its own, I would call the reverse at least MS65, if not actually a touch finer. Another feature of this coin that deserves commendation is its blazing, frosty luster. This coin is original and has not been enhanced or “improved” like so many other 1850-D gold dollars. The coloration is a thrilling medium to deep green-gold and orange with some steel-blue tones at the obverse periphery. The color gives this coin a very high eye degree of eye appeal. I consider this coin to be the finest known 1850-D gold dollar by a fairly substantial margin despite the fact that it is tied with another example graded MS64 by NGC.

The 1850-D has long been one of the more underrated Type One gold dollars. It is the fifth rarest of 13 issues from the Dahlonega mint. Of the 8,382 struck there are an estimated 125-150 known with the typical piece grading EF40 or so. Despite the population figures from PCGS and NGC, there are no more than six to eight Mint State pieces known and nearly all are in the MS60 to MS61 range. The Green Pond: 1002 coin was graded MS61 and showed a typical weak strike on the obverse. In all of our years of selling great Dahlonega gold coins at auction, we have never offered an 1850-D gold dollar that graded higher than MS62 and only two at that level.

Ex: Duke’s Creek collection, Hancock and Harwell, Doug Winter.

FINEST KNOWN 1851-D GOLD DOLLAR GRADED MS65 BY NGC AND PEDIGREED TO THE BAREFORD COLLECTION 1851-D NGC MS65. Variety 3-E. All four digits of the date are lightly recut with this showing most clearly below the upright of the first 1. Intermediate die state with some cracks on the reverse. There are two varieties known of which this is the more common; an estimated two-thirds of the 1851-D gold dollars struck employ this die pair.

This is among the more important condition rarities in the Duke’s Creek collection of Dahlonega gold dollars. It has long been regarded as the finest known 1851-D and it has a long pedigree that includes some of the more famous branch mint gold collectors from the past half century. It is also an important enough coin that the late Dahlonega specialist Jack Hancock bought and sold it at least four times (!)

The strike is extremely sharp for the issue with full radial lines noted within the stars. The hair has fully defined curls while the wreath is bold. Both the obverse and reverse show a number of clashmarks with the most prominent seen on the reverse. The surfaces are very clean, as one would expect from a Dahlonega gold dollar that has been accorded an MS65 grade by NGC (none has been graded this high at PCGS either). When the coin is tilted just right, it is possible to see a small cluster of thin hairlines below the bust; there are also a few small ticks in the obverse fields but none of these is deep enough to merit a description. Perhaps the best feature of this coin is its superb frosty luster. The 1851-D tends to have better luster than nearly any other gold dollar from this mint but even by this standard, the Duke’s Creek piece is remarkable. Both the obverse and reverse show light green-gold color with pale yellowish highlights. The overall level of eye appeal is very pleasing and this is truly a handsome coin that deserves to be called a Gem.

This has long been regarded as the finest known 1851-D and it ranks as one of the three or four nicest Dahlonega gold dollars of any date that I have personally seen. It would make a great type coin for the collector seeking a single very high quality Dahlonega gold dollar or it would greatly improve a specialist’s date collection. This is the only 1851-D gold dollar graded MS65 by either service.

Ex: Duke’s Creek collection, Hancock and Harwell, Leon Farmer collection, Hancock and Harwell, Georgia collection, Hancock and Harwell, Stack’s Auction ’84: 1297 ($9,900), Arthur Montgomery collection, Hancock and Harwell, Stack’s Bareford collection (12/78): 15, Hollinbeck 11/47: 1418. Plated in the first edition of Doug Winter’s “Gold Coins of the Dahlonega Mint, 1838-1861.”

THE DUKE’S CREEK-ELIASBERG 1852-D GOLD DOLLAR: THE HIGHEST GRADED BY EITHER SERVICE 1852-D NGC MS63. Variety 4-F. The only variety of this year. Struck from strongly clashed and lapped dies as on all known examples. The diagnostic die scratch on the reverse past the second A in AMERICA is plainly visible.

This is one of the two or three best struck 1852-D gold dollars that I have seen. In spite of the fact that the dies had severely clashed, the details seen at both the obverse and reverse center are extremely sharp with full individually-defined curls seen on the head of Liberty, complete radial lines on the stars and a sharp date. Some slight weakness can be seen on the obverse and reverse denticles but this is the result of an improper collar and not actual weakness of strike. The surfaces show no readily distinguishable abrasions, just a host of clashmarks and roughness in the die as made. There are multiple clashmarks in the left obverse field but this appears to be a reasonably early die state. Under a magnification, some very light hairlines (not from cleaning, by the way) can be seen in the right obverse field and at the center of the reverse. The luster is frosty and far above average for the issue. Most 1852-D gold dollars are worn to the point that little natural luster remains and the higher grade examples that exist usually have a dull, grainy texture. There are splashes of intense orange-gold at the central obverse and around the stars; the reverse shows deeper and somewhat more even color which is a bit lighter in hue near the 1 in the value.

The 1852-D is the sixth rarest Dahlonega gold dollar in terms of its overall rarity and the eighth in high grades. Around 100-125 are known with perhaps seven to nine of these grading Uncirculated by today’s interpretations. Nearly all of these are in the MS60 to MS61 range and a properly graded MS62 is very rare. The present example was described by me in 2003 in the Condition Census of 'Gold Coins of the Dahlonega Mint, 1838-1861" are being the finest known 1852-D gold dollar and it remains so today.

Ex: Duke’s Creek collection, Hancock and Harwell, Leon Farmer collection, Hancock and Harwell, Georgia collection, Hancock and Harwell, Bowers and Ruddy 10/82: 16 ($1,430), Eliasberg collection, John Clapp Jr. and John Clapp Sr. collections, Chapman Brothers 4/1897, M.H. Brown collection. Plated in the first edition of Doug Winter’s “Gold Coins of the Dahlonega Mint, 1838-1861.”

HIGH GRADE 1853-D GOLD DOLLAR 1853-D NGC MS64. Variety 5-G. Easily identifiable by the presence of a die file mark on the obverse from the rim to the base of the star located at 9:00.

This is a very well struck example with a sharp obverse. The hair and stars and fully defined and this is not frequently seen on 1853-D gold dollars. The reverse shows some minor weakness on the 85 in the date but the overall quality of strike is reasonably sharp for the issue.

Under magnification, there are a few very small marks and light hairlines (not from cleaning) that are consistent with the grade assigned by NGC. The reverse is of Gem quality. Both sides exhibit rich frosty luster with a slightly grainy texture. The color is a light green-gold with some pale yellowish hues seen on the high spots. This is a very pleasing example for the grade and it is clearly among the finest known.

The 1853-D is the fourth rarest of the six Type One gold dollars from this mint and the ninth rarest overall of the thirteen issues. Only 6,583 were produced of which 125-150 are known today. This date is most often seen in EF and AU grades. It is very rare in Uncirculated with an estimated six to nine properly graded pieces known. There are a pair of Superb Gems from the Jackson, Tennessee hoard which first came on the market around five or six years ago. One of them, graded MS66 by NGC, is fully Prooflike and it is one of the two best Dahlonega gold dollars of any date that I have ever seen in person.

This piece is listed in the current Condition Census as being tied with a few other pieces as the fifth finest known for the date.

Ex: Duke’s Creek collection, Hancock and Harwell, Leon Farmer collection, Hancock and Harwell, Georgia collection, Hancock and Harwell, Stack’s Auction ’84: 1299 ($14,850), Arthur Montgomery collection, Hancock and Harwell, Paramount Auction ’81: 1332 ($8,200), NASCA 12/76: 2200, McNally collection. This is the plate coin in the first edition of Doug Winter’s book “Gold Coins of the Dahlonega Mint, 1838-1861.”

ONE OF THE FINEST KNOWN 1854-D GOLD DOLLARS 1854-D NGC MS62. Variety 6-H. Obverse and reverse die scratches as seen on all examples.

The obverse is uncommonly sharp for this date with the stars showing strong radial lines detail and the hair nearly full with many of the individual strands visible. The reverse shows a more typical strike with a bit of weakness seen on the LLA in DOLLAR and the 54 in the date. I would still rate this coin as one of the better struck 1854-D gold dollars that I have seen in some time.

The surfaces have some light ticks and hairlines in the fields with the most visible of these present on the obverse. However, nothing can be seen with the naked eye that is deep or detracting. Unlike many pieces, this does not have clashmarks and it appears to be a fairly early die state. The luster is satiny and it is very slightly subdued in appearance; probably because of the depth of the orange-gold coloration which is seen on the obverse and the reverse. Almost every 1854-D shows poor luster and this piece is far above-average in this regard.

The 1854-D gold dollar is an issue which requires a bit of explanation to the non-specialist. It has a number of very distinct mint-made die characteristics. On the obverse there are always raised die scratches around many of the stars. Large, raised die scratches can also be seen on the reverse to the left of the mintmark and on up to the U in UNITED. Many neophytes have mistaken these for damage.

Just 2,935 examples were produced and this is the third rarest Dahlonega gold dollar, trailing only the 1855-D and the 1861-D. Fewer than 100 are known with around two dozen in AU and another dozen or so in Uncirculated. Nearly every Uncirculated coin known to me is in the MS60 to MS61 range and properly graded MS62’s are extremely rare. The Duke’s Creek collection specimen is clearly in the Condition Census and is certainly among the best to have come on the market in some time.

Ex: Duke’s Creek collection, Hancock and Harwell, Leon Farmer collection, Hancock and Harwell, Georgia collection, Hancock and Harwell, possibly ex: Stack’s Bareford (12/78): 26. This is the plate coin in the first edition of Doug Winter’s book “Gold Coins of the Dahlonega Mint, 1838-1861.”

FABULOUS FULL DATE 1855-D GOLD DOLLAR GRADED MS64 BY NGC. THE FINEST KNOWN EXAMPLE OF THE ONLY TYPE TWO ISSUE FROM THIS MINT 1855-D NGC MS64. Variety 7-I. The second 5 in the date is positioned totally below the A in DOLLAR.A very early die state with a remarkable full date and lacking the reverse mintmark seen on later die states. 1855-D gold dollars with a full date are extremely rare and I doubt if more than nine or ten are known. The Duke’s Creek example is the finest of these and its sharpness of strike is easily the best I have seen on any 1855-D.

The 1855-D is the second rarest Dahlonega gold dollar in terms of its overall rarity but it is clearly the rarest in high grades. Of the 1,811 produced there are probably no more than 75-90 pieces known. I know of four that would qualify as Uncirculated by today’s standards. This piece is clearly the finest and it is one of just two Mint State pieces with a full date. A strong case can be made for calling this coin one of the two most desirable Dahlonega gold dollars in existence, along with the Duke’s Creek 1861-D which will be offered for sale in just a few minutes.

As mentioned above, this issue is plagued by weakness of strike. Nearly every known 1855-D shows considerable weakness on the 8 and, sometimes, on the first 5. Sophisticated collectors have long regarded full date examples as very rare and desirable and in the past decade those with very sharp dates have traded at premium prices over those with typical weak dates. The present example has a remarkably bold date. It is almost fully detailed on both the obverse and the reverse despite the fact that there are clashmarks on both the obverse and the reverse. It is ironic—and appropriate—that the finest known 1855-D gold dollar is also the best struck.

The surfaces are clean with just a few very fine hairlines (not from cleaning) in the fields. Under magnification there is some slight roughness as made. The aforementioned clashmarks are most noticeable at Liberty’s forehead and in front of the face; the reverse has some rather extensive and interesting clashmark patterns at the center.

Another amazing thing about this coin’s appearance is its luster. Most 1855-D gold dollars are worn to the point that no luster is visible and on the few higher grade pieces which are known the luster is typically dull and flat. This piece has bright, frosty luster with a texture more like a Philadelphia Type Two gold dollar than one from Dahlonega. The coloration is a light yellow-gold with some greenish tinges.

This is a truly remarkable coin which is certainly a highlight of the Duke’s Creek collection. We have been fortunate to sell many of the Condition Census examples of this date in the past few years. In the Platinum Night session of the January 2006 FUN sale the second finest known 1855-D gold dollar, graded MS64 by NGC, brought $109,250. While that coin was certainly a lovely example, it lacked a full date and, in our opinion is therefore not as desirable as this piece. We expect the Duke’s Creek 1855-D to set a record price for this date.

Ex: Duke’s Creek collection via Hancock and Harwell, Bowers and Merena 10/99: 102 ($92,000), Harry Bass collection, obtained via private treaty from Manfra, Tordella and Brookes in December 1974.

VERY RARE UNCIRCULATED 1856-D GOLD DOLLAR 1856-D NGC MS62. Variety 8-K. This is one of just 1,460 examples produced. All were made from a single pair of dies in May, 1856.

The strike is fairly typical for the issue with the obverse not as well detailed as the reverse. There is some flatness on the hair above the ear and around the face and the U in UNITED is, as always, weak. On the reverse the bases of the 85 in the date are weak and the O in DOLLAR is filled. The detail at the borders is better than usual with most of the denticles fully defined and a good amount of the wreath can be plainly seen with the naked eye.

The surfaces are very clean for the date and grade. There are no very detracting marks visible to the naked eye. With light magnification, a tiny nick in front of Liberty’s nose can be seen. This is not a really important mark and is mentioned mostly for a purpose of future identification.The luster is satiny and somewhat subdued in its texture. This piece shows a good amount of luster for the issue. There are splashes of reddish-gold color on the obverse; the reverse is an intense reddish-gold shade that is most prominent from 4:00 to 11:00 at the border.

This is, overall, a very handsome example of this rare date. The 1856-D is the third rarest Dahlonega gold dollar in terms of overall rarity, trailing only the 1855-D and the 1861-D. In high grades, it is the second rarest issue, trailing only the 1855-D. The PCGS and NGC population reports both include some pieces in the MS60 to MS61 that are, in my opinion, enthusiastically grade. These numbers are also inflated by resubmissions. In my best estimation there are around four to six pieces known. The single best 1856-D gold dollar I have seen is the PCGS MS62 from the Green Pond collection that was sold as Lot 1009 in Heritage’s January 2004 for a remarkable $47,150. The Duke’s Creek collection example is high in the Condition Census and it is likely to be the best piece available to advanced collectors for quite some time.

Ex: Duke’s Creek collection, Hancock and Harwell, Leon Farmer collection.

THE FINEST KNOWN 1857-D GOLD DOLLAR: PEDIGREED TO THE ELIASBERG COLLECTION 1857-D NGC MS62. Variety 9-L. The reverse used for this issue is likely the same as that found on the 1856-D gold dollar. It has a filled O in DOLLAR as well as raised segments on the reverse from 2:00 to 5:00, as struck.

The piece shows an average strike for the issue with some weakness on the hair of Liberty. Around half of the hair shows individual definition with the greatest amount of weakness seen on the curls around the face; the top of the head is sharper than usual. The date is nearly full with some minor weakness on the tops of the 85.

Most every 1857-D gold dollar that I have seen is abraded and has below-average quality surfaces. This piece is quite clean with just a few scattered marks and hairlines in the fields. The reverse center has a few ticks, none of which are deep or worth of specific mention. A small reverse planchet chip at the top of the ride side of the wreath is mint-made and clearly identifies this example. As mentioned above, what looks like small scratches on the reverse border are, in fact, mint-made die scratches which are diagnostic to the issue. The luster is far above average for the issue. Both the obverse and reverse are frosty and this is unusual as many pieces are dull and appear lifeless. There are splashes of reddish-gold coloration that are most prevalent at the edge of the obverse; the reverse has lighter and slightly more even color.

The 1857-D has a mintage of 3,533 and an estimated 120-130 are known. This is a very rare coin in Uncirculated with no more than five to seven properly graded examples known. The Duke’s Creek coin has long been regarded as the finest known and it has a wonderful pedigree to go along with it.

Ex: Duke’s Creek collection, Hancock and Harwell, Leon Farmer collection, Hancock and Harwell, Georgia collection, Hancock and Harwell, Bowers and Ruddy 10/82: 36, Eliasberg collection, John Clapp Jr., John Clapp Sr., B. Max Mehl 11/22, Rawson collection. This is the plate coin in the first edition of Doug Winter’s book “Gold Coins of the Dahlonega Mint, 1838-1861.”

INCREDIBLE NGC MS66 1858-D GOLD DOLLAR: THE FINEST KNOWN AND THE HIGHEST GRADED GOLD DOLLAR IN THIS COLLECTION 1858-D NGC MS66. Variety 10-M. This is the only variety for the year. It is characterized by thick lettering on the obverse with the second S in STATES joined solid. The date is well centered and evenly placed while the mintmark is large and well centered.

There are two Gem 1858-D gold dollars known of which this example is the best. In fact, it is among my personal favorite Dahlonega gold dollars of any date and it has a simply wonderful appearance that will be discussed in greater detail in just a minute.

This coin has a lot going for it and its best attribute is its “freshness.” It has the sort of look that is hard to describe. It has obviously been carefully preserved since it was made and it has thick, frosty luster and superb rich coloration that is almost never seen on a Dahlonega coin, regardless of date or denomination. With the exception of some weakness on the ER in AMERICA, the strike is quite bold for the issue. The tips of the bonnet are sharper than usual while the milling at the obverse border is nearly complete. On the reverse, all of the detail is very strong with a full date, sharp wreath detail and bold milling. There is one very small mint-made flake below the E in UNITED. This is the result to a piece of foreign matter sticking to the die at the time of strike and it is seen on nearly all 1858-D gold dollars. With the exception of this trivial mark, the surfaces are nearly perfect and really “as struck.” The luster is phenomenal. It is ultra-thick in texture with an aura in front of Liberty’s face and behind her head that is reminiscent of that seen on certain frosty Gem Three Dollar gold pieces. The coloration is a subtle orange-gold hue with some greenish tinges on the high spots of the obverse; the reverse is a bit deeper with an area of rich coppery-gold at the center.

From the standpoint of aesthetics, this could well be the best Dahlonega gold coin in the entire sale. It has everything going for it: clean surfaces, great luster and color and that je ne sais quoi which makes certain gold coins special. If you have been seeking a very high grade gold dollar from this mint as a type example, here is a piece that you should give very strong consideration to.

The current auction record for an 1858-D gold dollar was set in February 1999 when we sold the ex: Miller collection coin (then graded MS65 by NGC) for $46,000. Look for this record to be broken when the Duke’s Creek collection is sold.

Ex: Duke’s Creek collection, Hancock and Harwell, Gene Sanders, David Akers session of Auction ’90: 1825 ($33,000), David Akers session of Auction ’89: 1345 ($15,400).

NGC GRADED MS64 1859-D GOLD DOLLAR— ONE OF THE FINEST KNOWN EXAMPLES OF THIS DATE 1859-D NGC MS64. Variety 11-N. Higher date than on the other variety of this year with the 9 under the left foot of the A in DOLLAR. Late die state with unusual clashmarks on the reverse from 7:00 to 8:00. Other clashmarks, which are more typical for this issue, can be seen around the bust and at the central reverse.

This is a very well struck coin for the issue. On the obverse, most of the hair is clearly visible while the border is nicely defined. The reverse has some minor weakness on the 85 in the date and the OLL in DOLLAR while the border is sharp. The surfaces are reasonably clean with a few very faint light scratches visible below the bust; these can only be seen when the coin is tilted into a light source. More noticeable, and serving as clear identification, are a shallow curved lintmark on the lower portion of Liberty’s cheek as well as a small mint-made lamination that is located in the same general area. The luster is frosty and undisturbed while the coloration is a natural light to medium rose-gold with some greenish tinges in the right obverse field. For all intents and purposes this coin is a virtual Gem by today’s standards but it has been slightly net graded on account of the aforementioned lamination on the cheek. It is the second finest 1859-D gold dollar known to me, trailing only the Green Pond: 1012 coin. It is the second finest graded at NGC (exceeded only by a single MS65 coin of which I am not aware) and none have been graded higher than this at PCGS.

The 1859-D is a relatively common issue in higher grade by the standards of Dahlonega gold dollars. There may be as many as twenty known in Uncirculated including a few reasonably choice examples.

Ex: Duke’s Creek collection, Hancock and Harwell, Leon Farmer collection, Superior 1/93: 1272, Heritage 11/92, Dr. Richard Appel, Steve Contursi, Stack’s 10/90: 1010. This is the plate coin in the first edition of Doug Winter’s “Gold Coins of the Dahlonega Mint, 1838-1861.”

THE HIGHEST GRADED 1860-D GOLD DOLLAR: AN NGC MS64 EXAMPLE 1860-D NGC MS64. Variety 12-P. This is the only known die pair for this year. It has an extremely small date and a very large mintmark.

Only 1,566 examples of this date were struck. In the past, the rarity of the 1860-D has been way overstated and it is actually somewhat overrated in terms of its total rarity. But in higher grades it is a very rare coin and it trails only the 1855-D, 1861-D and 1854-D in AU and above. It is an extremely rare coin in Uncirculated with around seven to nine pieces known.

The 1860-D is the worst struck gold dollar from the Dahlonega mint. That said, the Duke’s Creek example is the best struck 1860-D I have ever seen. It has a good amount of detail on the U in UNITED and much sharpness on the periphery of the obverse. Equally strong and also worthy of description is the hair which shows much better definition than on any other 1860-D that I have seen. The date is nearly full and OLLA in DOLLAR lacks all but the slightest amount of weakness. This is truly remarkable for an issue that is usually seen with such a poor strike. There are two light scrapes on the obverse in front of Liberty’s nose and a few small hairlines (not from cleaning) on the surfaces. The reverse has some minor mint-made roughness at the center that appears to be the result of a few small flecks of foreign material on the die at the time of striking. The luster is slightly steely in texture and has a typical “hard” appearance as seen on the other high grade 1860-D gold dollars that are known. As usual it is a bit more pronounced on the obverse than on the reverse. Both sides are covered with rich orange-gold color.

This is the only 1860-D gold dollar to have ever been graded MS64 by either service and it is listed in the current Condition Census as the finest known. It is an extremely important coin and, obviously, one of the highlights of this remarkable collection of Dahlonega gold dollars.

Ex: Duke’s Creek collection, Hancock and Harwell, New York Gold Mart (Ron Karp).

THE FINEST GRADED 1861-D GOLD DOLLAR— AN NGC MS65 AND A HIGHLIGHT OF THE DUKE’S CREEK COLLECTION 1861-D NGC MS65. Variety 12-Q. The only dies of the year. The obverse is the same as on the 1860-D. On the reverse the date is small and positioned somewhat to the left.

The 1861-D is the rarest and most famous gold dollar from this mint. It is also the single most coveted coin from Dahlonega as it is the only regular issue that was produced entirely by the Confederacy. After the Mint was seized in April 1861, between 1,000 and 1,500 examples were struck by the Rebel forces. It is unlikely that more than five to six dozen are known today. Interestingly, more of these exist in high grade than one might expect and there are probably more than a dozen in Uncirculated. This is almost certainly due to the fact that examples were saved as souvenirs.

This issue has a very distinct appearance and this is, in my opinion, part of its charm. It is always found with a weak strike on the obverse and this example is no exception. The UN in UNITED are weak but they are actually more distinctive than usual. The IC in AMERICA is also weak but, again, they appear more fully defined than on nearly any other example of the 1861-D gold dollar that I have seen. There is also some weakness on the left side of the denticles; this is diagnostic to the issue. The reverse is remarkable and has probably the fullest strike I can recall having seen on an 1861-D. The date and mintmark are full while the word DOLLAR is complete except for the O which shows some softness. There are multiple clashmarks which are heaviest near the R in DOLLAR. These clashmarks can also be seen along the portrait on the obverse but they are not as strong. Some of the field near the left side of the portrait is semi-reflective and this is very likely due to someone at the mint attempting to remove the clashmarks The surfaces of this coin are very clean and suggest that this coin has been carefully preserved since it was produced almost 150 years ago. There is one tiny shallow tick in the left obverse field and another shallow, unobtrusive mark on Liberty’s cheek. These serve as excellent identifiers for future pedigree information. The luster that this piece shows is exceptional. It literally “drips” off the surfaces and is far above average for a date that, surprisingly, can be found with good luster. The obverse is graced by rich orange-gold color with some steel highlights at the center and towards the edge; the reverse is slightly lighter with deepening to an olive hue at the border.

In my opinion there are three really great 1861-D gold dollars known: the Ullmer-Pierce coin (graded MS64 by PCGS) which is in an Alabama collection, the Green Pond/Eliasberg coin (graded MS63 by PCGS) which was last sold by Heritage in January 2004 and the Duke’s Creek coin which is being offered today. It would not surprise me to see this coin set an all-time record for a Dahlonega gold coin, given the demand for rare coins with great stories.

Ex: Duke’s Creek collection, Hancock and Harwell, Leon Farmer collection, Stack’s 1/90: 1594 ($31,900), Tony Terranova, Superior 1/89: 274 ($24,200), Dr. Philip Weinstein. This is the plate coin in the first edition of “Gold Coins of the Dahlonega Mint, 1838-1861.”

The Graying of the Coin Business

The coin business continues to grow but will there be any dynamic younger dealers left to service the next generation of new collectors? I am in my mid-40’s and I represent one of the last waves of coin dealers. If you go to any coin show, you’ll see plenty of dealers in the 40-60 year old range. But you’ll see virtually no coin dealers in their 20’s or early 30’s. This worries me. What sort of future does the coin business hold if there are no up-and-coming dealers?

The lack of young dealers means that this business will become more “self-serve” in the coming years. By this I mean that most collectors will have to purchase their coins through impersonal sources like EBay with little or no guidance from a trusted resource. For some people, this will be no problem; they do not need the guidance they get from a dealer. For others, they will never get the satisfaction that a good dealer-collector relationship can provide.

I think the lack of young dealers boils down to one major issue: the extreme expense it takes in starting and running a successful coin business in today’s market. When I opened my business in 1984, I had less than $50,000 in operating capital. Today, it takes a significant six-figure investment to run a coin business.

I would personally like to see organizations like the Professional Numismatist Guild (PNG) create mentoring programs that match young numismatists with dealers and foster an environment that encourages more young people to choose numismatics as a career. Some large firms like Heritage and NGC offer internships for college age numismatists that are a great introduction to the reality of numismatic as a career.

While I’m not sure that I’d like to be 25 years old again, I’d sure like to be well-positioned in a growing industry that has a future leadership void. Teach your son or daughter how to grade coins…you have a better chance of him becoming the next Jim Halperin than the next Tiger Woods!

San Francisco Gold Coinage

Having just returned from a nice long weekend in lovely San Francisco, I found myself often* asking the question “why doesn’t such a great town with such an indisputable numismatic history have a more active collecting base?” I can think of at least four reasons why San Francisco gold coins lag their fellow branch mints’ popularity.

    No one has written a book on these coins. Without seeming too egotistical, I think that my books on Charlotte, Dahlonega, Carson City and New Orleans books have been real shots in the arm for each of these mints. If and when someone writes an accessible, concise book about San Francisco gold coins, this will remedy a century of neglect. I won’t be writing this book. Will anyone step up to the plate?

    Unlike the Southern gold coinage, production of San Francisco issues dragged on for nearly a century and entailed denominations ranging from gold dollars to double eagles. There are simply too many coins for most collectors to keep track of and they come in too wide a range of size. If I were the Czar of San Francisco Gold Collecting, I would try to market these issues in three age brackets: the early years (pre-1880 issues), the middle years (1880-1906) and the late years (1908-1930).

    Continuing on the same track as Reason #2, there are too many different types of San Francisco coins to get all-encompassing collections started. The individual who collects St. Gaudens double eagles is unlikely to collect gold dollars. This seems to be a case of “never the twain shall meet” and because of this, San Francisco gold coins continue to have small pockets of cult interest that never merge together to form bigger interest groups.

    Despite not being very popular many San Francisco gold issues are already very highly priced. This makes it harder to market them as undervalued sleepers. In a related vein, many of the early issues are very rare in all grades. Very rare coins are hard to promote because they are hard to find in any quantity.

* = OK, so I’m exaggerating here. I actually didn’t think about business or coins at all the whole weekend but on the plane ride back the subject did come up once or twice…