Key Date Price Performance

At the end of my last blog, I mentioned that the price gains in the coin market that many collectors and investors have been seeing are somewhat misleading. My guess is that if you took a random sample of 100 miscellaneous coins and calculated their price appreciation since 2003, fewer than 20% would show plusses. Some would even show minuses. If you had asked me in 2003 which coins would have shown the greatest gains, I would have split my answer(s) in two: traditional “trophy” coins and popular key dates in the most avidly collected series. My answers have turned out to be partially right as key dates have performed exceptionally well. What has really surprised me, though, is that the traditional trophy coins that have inevitably led the way in past bull markets have not necessarily been the best performers this time around.

I consider traditional trophy coins to be things like Stellas, High Reliefs, Pan-Pac Round and Octagonal $50’s, Proof gold (especially high denominations), etc. In the past, rich guys who didn’t know much about coins tended to gravitate towards these categories because they were big and sexy.

But things have been different this time around and I attribute this mainly to a coin market that is far, far more information-driven than in the past. In 1998, the rich guy who wanted to buy a few neat coins for his portfolio had no easy way to figure out how rare something was. Additionally, he was likely to be dealing with a salesman (as opposed to a numismatist) at a large marketing-oriented firm who had little knowledge about coins. Since both parties tended to be dealing from ignorance, it made sense that the unsophisticated seller would focus on a big, shiny High Relief or a Stella as the unsophisticated buyer was most likely to relate to such a coin.

Fast forward to 2008 and the market has changed. Information about coins has spread virally on the Internet and now, with an investment of a few hours, people can read a lot of good information about a wide variety of topics. In addition, the person selling coins to the big money buyers is likely to be more sophisticated as well. He needs a more interesting product to set himself apart from his competitors and the Old School Trophy Coins of the 1990’s suddenly seem passé. Just as importantly, the new breed of buyers can go on-line and see the population figures for coins like Stellas and High Reliefs. Due to significant resubmissions, these former rarities now seem common. The new buyers want exceedingly rare coins that no one else can have.

And this is where the New Right Coins come into play. If you follow auctions, you’ll note that in the last year or so, the types of coins that have been bringing jaw-dropping money are things like 1804 Dimes in AU55 and 1850 Quarters in PR68 and 1920-S Eagles in MS67. All three of these are truly great coins but they are not coins that, five years ago, I would have expected collectors or investors to have paid record-shattering prices for. In the old coin market these coins were “really neat but really exotic.” Today, they are the Right Coins.

Not everyone, of course, can afford to spend $632,500 on an 1804 Dime or $480,000 on a Proof 1850 Quarter. And, interestingly enough, lower grade examples of these same issues are not necessarily going to drive big money new collectors into a feeding frenzy (my guess is that the collector who paid $480,000 for his PR68 1850 quarter would have been A LOT less interested in a PR64 example of this date).

So what are the right coins for those of us who don’t have an extra $480,000 lying around to buy a Proof 1850 quarter? (and, by the way, I don’t mean to “pick” on Mr. 1850 Quarter as I think this is a great coin...just not one I expected to see sell for nearly half a million bucks...)

In this market, I would look to be a value-oriented collector or investor and would stick with coins that are very scarce to very rare, “interesting” from the standpoint of history, aesthetically appealing and old.

In the realm of rare date gold, some of the coins that I think will continue to perform well in spite of the vicissitudes of the market include the following:

-Virtually any 18th century issue

-Virtually any Liberty Head coin that is either the finest known or solidly in the Condition Census

-Any very low mintage coin (for business strikes, this is generally 2,500 or lower; for Proofs this is generally 50 or lower)

-Any coin pedigreed to a great collection (Bass, Garrett, Norweb, Eliasberg and a few others are great collections. The Rainy Day collection of CC Double Eagles IS NOT a great collection...)

-Virtually any coin that is historically significant (1861-D gold dollar, 1838-C and 1838-D half eagles, 1854-D three dollar gold, 1879-O double eagle, etc.)

-Coins that have original skin and a great, original appearance

-Any coin in a popular series that is rare and in demand. This is a huge range; from Rarity-7 Bust Half Dollar die varieties to key date Morgans in perfect, original AU55 to important one-year type coins like the 1808 quarter eagle to rare date Saints in MS63 and better with CAC stickers.

2008 Crystal Ball Survey - Part Two

In the second part of this series, I reveal my answers to the final question from the Rosen 2007-2008 Crystal Ball survey. There are some very interesting questions asked here and some controversial answers so read on for my insights into the current State of the Market. For the following six (6) questions I ask you for your Best Buy selections in a number of series. Please detail why you made your picks and the potential you see for them.

10. Your Best Buys for U.S. Type Coins.

a. Seated Dimes, Quarters and Half Dollars in Mint State-64 to Mint State-66. I think you will see significant appreciation in this area in the coming year or two. b. Barber Dimes, Quarter and Half Dollars in MS64 to MS66 and PR64 to PR66. They aren’t the most attractive coins in the world from the standpoint of design but they are very cheap right now. You can buy a pleasing MS65 Barber Dime for less than $500. c. Gem Trade Dollars. I just never seem to see true MS65 Trade Dollars. Current Bluesheet bid for MS65’s is something like $7,000. They are great deals at double to triple this price. d. Large Size Bust Dimes and Quarters in just about any grade from VF and up. For every one of these you see, there are about ten Bust Halves. If I were going to start collecting coins I think I’d do a date set of Large Size Bust Dimes and maybe expand it to include all of the Redbook varieties. Most of the dates can be bought in nice VF and EF for less than a few thousand dollars.

11. Your Best Buys for Gold Coins.

a. Any Charlotte or Dahlonega gold coin that hasn’t been scrubbed in EF and AU grades. There are fewer of these remaining than people realize. b. Better date $5 Indians and $10 Indians. In the former I really like the S mint dates in MS64 and MS65. In the latter I like virtually any P mint not dated 1911, 1926 or 1932 as well as the tough mintmarked dates in MS64 and MS65. c. Affordable Proof gold. I find that whenever I have an interesting piece of Proof gold in stock for less than $20,000 it sells quickly. d. Gem Matte Proof gold that hasn’t been conserved. Does any exist outside of museums or old-time collections? e. MS66 $2.50 Libs. Seems like they should have a greater premium over MS65’s than they currently do. This is a reflection of the fact that today’s 66’s are not much nicer than most 65’s. If grading tightens on this series, I think the 66’s have real upside.

12. Your Best Buys for Silver Dollars.

a. Semi-Key Morgan Dollars in MS65. I like dates like the 1898-S,1899-S and 1900-S. b. Rare date Peace Dollars in accurately graded MS65. If someone would ever take the time to write a really good collector guide to this series and promote them half as well as Morgans have been, these coins would really take off. They are a great value.

13. Your Best Buys for U.S. Commemoratives.

I’m not enthusiastic about any Commems but if I had to pick any, I’d stick with the issues from the 1910’s and 1920’s in MS66 with attractive light to medium color.

14. Your Best Buys for 20th century collector series.

a. Peace Dollars in MS65, as mentioned above. b. Non Full Head Standing Liberty Quarters. I don’t know this series very well but the non-FH’s seem cheap compared to the FH coins. c. Any Proof Barber coins which are decent looking and priced under $1,000. Good value!!

15. Your Best Buys for any other area of your choice.

a. One year type coins or coins with a good story. In the area of dated gold this entails issues like 1861-D gold dollars and half eagles, 1838-C&D quarter eagles and half eagles, 1839-C&D quarter eagles and half eagles, 1838 eagles, etc. As people move more towards type collecting within the dated series, we are seeing a huge premium paid for significant one-year type, first-year-of-issues, etc. b. Pretty coins that don’t command stratospheric premiums. I look through thousands of coins at every show at auction and am amazed at how few are pretty. If you can buy, say, an MS66 Barber Quarter with lovely color for a 10-15% premium over a dipped-out, mediocre example I think this is great value. c. Some ultra-rare coins are still good deals. I think the 1876-CC Twenty Cent Piece has the potential to be a $750,000-1,000,000 coin in the not-so-distant future. d. Proof Bust coins are still fair value, especially in the PR64 and PR65 grades. But beware of examples in slabs that are not Proofs. As a smart dealer recently told me, “if it doesn’t look like a Proof...it ain’t!” e. Colonials and Early Americana. This is an area that shouldn’t be tackled without an expert’s help but how can you not love coins like New Jersey or Connecticut Coppers in attractive middle grades for less than $1,000 per coin? I wouldn’t necessarily look at this area as an “investment” but I think it is one place where a comparatively small collecting budget can still go a long, long way.

16. The sheer scope and market value of Modern Coins has grown greatly over the years such that Classic U.S. coins are facing increasingly strong competition for collector interest. A) What does this mean for the future of the Classic Coin market?

There are always going to be collectors who prefer classic coins but I would expect that a sizable number of the new collectors who enter the market in the coming years will focus on moderns. Many younger collectors just don’t “get” classic coins and they vastly prefer modern issues. I’ve personally learned to accept this as a fact, just like I’ve come to accept the fact that there are at least two generations who barely know what a vinyl record is and who get all their music via MP3’s and online downloads.

B) What does it mean for the potential of the Modern Coin marketplace?

I think there are great opportunities for marketers and dealers in the modern coin market. It’s going to be interesting to see if this market is structured like the classic coin market or if it gets an entirely new structure. My guess is that there is some young guy out there who is going to become the Sean Fanning of the modern coin market—he’s going to develop the “killer app” that makes him a fortune and which revolutionizes the way modern coins are collected and bought/sold. I think collectors should be encouraged to specialize in whatever turns them on and if happens to be modern coins then more power to them!

17. Do you think rare coins are priced too cheap in relation to other investment areas? Compare to art, antiques, stocks, real estate, you name it.

As someone who is extremely interested in art, I find coins to be absurdly cheap. To be a serious player right now in an area like Contemporary Art, you are looking at spending $1 million++ for something that’s good but not great. I personally love 15th and 16th century Italian art but no matter how rich I was, I couldn’t buy any great works—they are essentially all in museums. But in the coin market you can buy museum quality rarities for $20,000. You need to remember, though, that there is one critical difference between art and coins. When you buy art, you hang it on the wall and impress your friends with your taste and high degree of sophistication. You can’t hang a coin on the wall and even if you could it’s way too small to make you the envy of your town’s Swanky People. I wouldn’t compare coins to real estate or stocks as that’s way too “apples to oranges” in context.

18. A) What one series strikes you as particularly undervalued?

There are lots of series I like but two that come to mind are Liberty Seated half dollars and New Orleans eagles. Both are big, both are relatively attractive from a design standpoint and both offer collectors an area where $5,000-10,000 will buy you something really special.

B) What dates and grades in that series make the most sense for an investor to buy?

In Seated half dollars, I like the No Motto New Orleans coins in MS63 and better, especially those with attractive light to medium natural color. The survival rate of these issues is very low and most are very rare in Uncirculated, despite being priced at less than $7,500 per coin for the most part. In New Orleans Liberty Eagles I like the No Motto coins in original, unprocessed AU and above and I like the With Motto coins in MS63 and better.

What is their upside potential?

I think many of the Seated half dollars that I mentioned above that currently trade for $5,000-7,500 could double within the next five years, especially if more people start collecting Seated half dollars by date. The good quality New Orleans eagles are already bringing well over CDN Bid when they sell at auction but the price reporting for these issues is about a year or two behind the actual market.

19. What are your one, two, or three most favorite coins in all of numismatics that you would qualify as "sleepers," very undervalued?

a. Truly original, accurately graded C&D mint gold coins in About Uncirculated. I wouldn’t be surprised if coins like this start bringing huge premiums over their scrubby counterparts in the near future. b. Just about any No Motto Seated quarter or half dollar in MS64 or better. Forget the original mintage figures of these coins as they are very rare. You can also forget the current pricing guides as they typically bring multiples of Bid or Trends at auction when they are offered for sale. c. Pre-1834 quarter eagles in nearly any grade. With the exception of the 1796 No Stars and the 1808, these are much undervalued. In fact, they are far rarer than early half eagles or eagles of this era but still sell at a discount because of their reasonably small size. Coins with unadulterated original surfaces are really hard to find! d. Proof Bust coinage. There have been very few Proof bust coins that have traded since the market started shooting upwards five+ years ago but, in my opinion, the few Proof bust coins that have sold have not brought nearly enough of a premium relative to their pre-2001 price levels. You can still buy a pretty nice Proof bust half dollar for under $50,000. That’s just too cheap for a coin as rare as this. e. Proof half cents and large cents from the 1830’s, 1840’s and early 1850’s. Here’s another area where many prices have been flat for the past decade or so. I love coins like Proof half cents from the 1840’s in PR64 Brown or PR64 Red and Brown for under $7,500. While I am not necessarily touting them as an investment, I think they are a terrific value.

20. A) Where are the young coin dealers? We remember hot-shot young turks of the past whose brilliant minds and trading skills were the envy of veteran dealers.

I think there are actually more people working in the coin business who are in their 20’s than most of us Old Dudes realize but very few of them standout as being the next Jason Carter or Ryan Carroll (the two best young coin dealers from the 1990’s and 2000’s, respectively). I think it’s very hard being a dealer in this day and age given the cost of starting a business and maintaining an inventory. When I started my own firm in 1984 I had less than $50,000 in capital. This wouldn’t get a young kid very far today. That said, this is a great business for young entrepreneurs. The typical successful coin dealer is now in his 40’s or 50’s and doesn’t want to work as hard as 10 or 20 years ago. There are a lot of A-level dealers who are going to retire or semi-retire in the next decade and I wonder who is going to take their place. If I had a 16 year old kid, I would certainly encourage him to take over my business as I start to wind things down in the next few years.

B) What's the future of being a coin dealer?

I anticipate that the coin dealer of the future is going to be valued more as a conduit of information or as a broker than anything else. I would expect that margins will continue to decrease. I think the days of the brick and mortar coin shop is just about history but I do expect there to be a continued need for highly competent, specialized dealers. I think you will also see a few mega-dealers emerge who become dominant forces in the market; as Heritage is currently on course to becoming right now (if they haven’t already done so...) I’m happy I’m not a young, struggling kid just coming up in the business although I see a lot more opportunity for mentorship and guidance than when I was coming up in the early 1980’s and things were A LOT more cut-throat.

2008 Crystal Ball Survey - Part One

For the last few years, I have been asked by Maurice Rosen, publisher of the excellent Rosen Numismatic Advisory newsletter, to be a contributor to his annual Crystal Ball survey. This feature, which generally has the participation of a half dozen or so very knowledgeable dealers, is an excellent way for me to analyze the coin market and the questions asked by Maurice are diverse and interesting. Here are my answers to the 2008/2009 RNA Crystal Ball Survey. Please note that due to the length of this article it will appear in two parts. 1. What's your outlook for the coin market in 2008/2009?

I think the market will be mostly strong in 2008 although I think we will see continued bifurcation as we have the last few years. By this I mean I think there will be great strength at the absolute upper end of the market and we will also see good demand for interesting lower priced coins but the middle market will continue to be weak; possibly more so than in 2007. I foresee some weakness in the economy in 2008 and I would imagine that because of the housing slowdown we will see fewer people throwing sizable amount of disposable income at things like coins. Really good coins, though, are going to do awfully well in the coming years. There just aren’t many of them around.

2. What areas of the market look to be the best performers in 2008/2009? Please state your reasons.

I think type coins will be a very strong performer in 2008, especially Seated and Barber coins in MS64 to MS67 and PR64 to PR67. Coins like this have been too cheap for too long and people have finally gotten wise to this. Early coins have gotten too expensive for most people (in higher grades) and the grading standards tend to be pretty atrocious in this area. I think a number of collectors are realizing that a smart place to be is in the Seated and Barber arena. You can still buy really nice coins that are 100+ years old for less than $5,000.

I expect that rarities and trophy coins will be extremely strong this year. I find it amazing that an 1804 $10 sold for $5 million dollars recently and I’ve got to think that $1 million dollar sales are going to be reasonably routine in 2008 and 2009.

I would expect that Proof Gold will do nicely in 2008 as will better date $5 Indians and $10 Indians.

In rare date and early gold, I think anything that is choice and original will be in demand this year. I am already noticing a large price spread between crusty coins and scrubbed coins and I think this will continue as originality becomes more and more in vogue in 2008. Here’s my advice for collectors and investors in 2008, 2009 and beyond. Buy coins that are interesting and which have good aesthetic appeal.  

3. What areas look to be the weakest? Again, please state why.

I would expect that silver commemoratives are going to stay very weak in 2008 unless some large marketing firm decides to promote them. They seem like great values right now but there are just too many of the little buggers around and unless you can count on selling thousands and thousands of coins, you can’t control the promotion.

I would have to think we will see some weakness in Registry Set coins that are perceived to be overvalued.

I also think that, with the exception of gold dollars, small-sized coins are not going to do well. As collectors get older and older, few people are able to see coins like Three Cent silvers and half dimes.

This is going to sound a little bit general but coins that are ugly are going to do poorly in 2008. No matter what the plastic says, if a coin is off quality, it will be hard to sell.

4. Since the 2001 lows, coin prices by some averages are up 20-50% but gold is up about 200%.

A) Have your clients expressed concerns about this?

How could they not express concern? While some areas of the market have done fabulously since 2001 (early type, early gold, rarities) many other areas have been extremely flat. In some cases, truly rare coins in relatively popular series are actually down in value since 2001, especially if you take out the gradeflation factor(s).

B) What do you tell them?

The truth. Which is, in my opinion, that as much as I love coins and the coin market in general, there are some problems that need to be cleaned up. These include accurate price reporting and the need for greater consistency among the grading services.

C) How do you see coins and gold performing from here on?

I think we’ll see gold break through the $1000 barrier but I’m not really sure where the short-term and medium-term caps are going to be. Perhaps $1250-1500-- after that, who really knows? I think price performance in the coin market is going to be selective. As I mentioned above, the market is becoming more and more bifurcated. I think there are going to be fewer collectors in the future but there will be more extremely rich people dabbling. If you buy the right coins and hold them long enough, you should do well. If you buy so-so or average quality coins you won’t do as well. Investors should learn to think like collectors and buy the sort of collector-quality coins (and, no, the expression “collector quality” does not mean 1901-S quarters in Fine) that have traditionally appreciated well over the course of time.

5. The U.S. Mint is the biggest coin dealer. Are they helping or hurting the coin market? Please explain in detail.

I can’t possibly imagine that it’s helping the coin market that hundreds and hundreds of millions of dollars are being spent on modern products that might (or might not...) be spent on rare coins. At least the Mint is now far more receptive to collectors than in the past and they seem to have extended the olive branch to the collecting community after years and years of disliking us.  

6. Coin grading has come a long way since PCGS started in 1986. A) What further advances are needed? B) How would they impact the market?

I’ve spoken with clients of mine who are involved in hedge funds or private equity groups and most of them won’t do a coin deal because the numbers are just too small. These guys are looking at doing $250 million+ deals (in many cases more than this) and a little $25 million to $50 million coin deal is just too small for them. That said, there is always the chance that a hedge fund guy who loves coins might do a fund as sort of a lark. But every time we’ve seen large funds in the coin market, the results have not been good.

If a fund were to be established, it needs to be run by someone like John Albanese who is very smart and very ethical. I assume that a fund run by someone like John would focus on really rare coins like Proof gold, early type (silver and gold), classic rarities and popular individual issues like High Reliefs, Pan-Pac Octagonal and Round $50’s, etc. This is essentially what the Ohio Fund was focusing on and I think they did a very good job in terms of buying coins and focusing on specific market areas.

7. A) How do you feel about the concept of "seals of approval" on graded coins?

I wish they weren’t needed but I think at this point in time they are a good idea—provided, of course, that the people involved with them are doing it for the right reasons.

B) What will the effects be of such slab labeling?

I think we are already seeing an effect. At least one of the services has become considerably more conservative in their grading in the past six to nine months.

8.Coin auctions: A) What's your best advice to consignors?

1. Don’t assume that auctions are always the best way to sell all coins.

2. Learn which firms sell which types of coins for the most money. As an example, I use one auction firm exclusively for any very low population 20th century coin I own as they get much better prices for these coins than anyone else. Conversely, I use another firm exclusively for more “sophisticated” coins as they do a better job describing them and their audience seems to be a bit more dialed in to these sorts of coins.

3. Don’t choose an auction firm solely based on their consignment rate. You get what you pay for.

4. The best times of the year to sell coins at auction are at FUN in January and at the ANA in July or August.

5. Hire an advisor to help you decide how to best market and sell your collection even if you think you know what you are doing. If you do it totally on your own the chances are good that you will leave money on the table.

B) What's your best advice to bidders?

1. Hire a well-qualified representative to bid for you at auction. It is the best 5% you will ever spend.

2. Never bid sight unseen on any coin at auction worth more than $1,000. And, no, you can’t accurately grade a coin based on images!

3. If you attend an auction in person, come prepared. Know what you what to bid on, what you want to spend and how much you are willing to stretch on any coin.

4. Sometimes the best auctions are the ones you don’t buy out of but which you learn from.  

9. Two sophisticated investors come to you to provide them a portfolio for a 5 to 10 year hold, one investing $25,000, the other $250,000.

A) How would you construct the portfolios?

$25,000 portfolio, as follows:

1. Stars Obverse Liberty Seated Dime, PCGS or NGC MS66, cost $4,000-5,000+. I think this has the potential to be a $7,500 coin.

2. No Motto Liberty Seated Quarter, PCGS or NGC MS65, cost $5,000-7,000+. If possible I would try to find a coin dated in the 1840’s and pay a premium of 20-40% for it. This could easily become a $10,000++ coin.

3. Barber Half Dollar, PCGS MS66, cost $4,000-5,000. I can see this coin becoming worth $7,500-10,000.

4. Liberty Quarter Eagle, PCGS or NGC PR65 Cameo, cost $12,500-15,000. I think this has the potential to become a $20,000 coin.

For the silver coins, I would try to buy very pretty originally toned pieces and for the Proof gold coin I’d try to find a coin that was not over-conserved.

$250,000 portfolio as follows:

1. A neat early copper coin, such as a 1793 half cent in AU or a nice Wreath cent or a pretty 1794 Cent with a good pedigree. I would avoid a Chain Cent as I think these are currently overpriced. I’d spend around $25,000 on this coin and I think it has the potential to double in the next five years.

2. A cool $25,000 early silver coin. It might be a really nice AU 1795 half dollar or a very pretty early dollar (preferably a 1796, 1797 or 1798).

3. A Large Size Bust Quarter in PCGS or NGC MS65. I’d be very selective when buying this coin and would hold out for a coin that had great original color, minimal friction on Liberty’s cheek and a good strike. I’d be willing to spend up to $25,000 on the right coin. This type could be worth $35,000-45,000 in a really hot market.

4. A great looking piece of early gold in the $25,000-35,000 range. I might look for a nice MS63 to MS64 Capped Bust Right half eagle or a Fat Head half eagle (1813, 1814, 1818 or 1820) in MS63. Again, I’d be ultra-selective and avoid a piece that has been processed. Although early gold has gone up a lot in price in the last five years, nice coins still have upside potential.

5. A small group (four to six coins) of Colonials priced in the $2,500-5,000 per coin range. I would use an expert in this area to be my guide and would shoot for coins that he thought were accurately graded and really attractive for the issue. This is a $10,000-20,000 investment that could double in the next decade.

6. A really neat New Orleans half eagle or eagle from the 1840’s worth $20,000-25,000 would be my next purchase. Having focused a significant amount of attention on these coins in the last few years, I know how incredibly rare they are and I think they are still wildly undervalued.

7. I’d finish the portfolio off with one or more of the following: a great piece of Proof gold from the 19th century, preferably in PR65 or higher and preferably with an original mintage figure of less than 50 coins; a few great No Motto Liberty Seated silver coins, preferably No Motto mintmarked coins in MS63 to MS65 with pleasing original color and a few neat collector coins—things like perfect EF Carson City half dollars or lovely original AU Bust halves. All of these areas still seem like good values to me and have excellent upside.

State of the New Orleans Gold Coin Market

I was discussing the State of the New Orleans Gold Coin Market yesterday with a collector and he pointed out something very interesting to me. In the calendar year of 2007, there were probably fewer important high grade New Orleans eagles sold than any other gold denomination from this mint. This got me thinking and the more I looked into this statement, the more I realized that it was true. 2007 began with a bang for New Orleans eagle collectors when Stack’s sold the Morgan collection. Included in this collection were coins such as the only Uncirculated example of the 1879-O (an NGC MS61 that I purchased as an agent for a California collector for a record $52,900) and the third finest known 1880-O (also graded MS61 by NGC; I purchased this for the same collector for $16,100).

After the strength of this sale, I expected the proverbial flood gates to open and a number of important, high grade New Orleans eagles to become available.

Shortly thereafter, I was able to offer the magnificent Pinnacle Collection of New Orleans gold which contained a number of Condition Census pieces in all denominations. With the exception of double eagles which were never a focus of the original owner, the eagles in this collection were probably the weakest denomination, at least from the standpoint of grade. There were some truly lovely eagles in this collection but unlike the quarter eagles and half eagles (which were virtually all MS60 and better and which included numerous coins high in the Condition Census) the eagles were mostly nice, original AU55 and AU58 coins.

After this flurry of activity in January, the New Orleans eagle market was very dry until Heritage offered a small but interesting group of pieces in the ANA sale. Of particular note were the second finest 1882-O (a PCGS MS63) that sold for a record $37,375, one of the finest known 1897-O (a PCGS MS64 that realized $14,950)and the third finest known 1899-O (an NGC MS64 that went for a reasonable $12,663). Another important piece in this sale was a very high end PCGS MS63 1892-O that sold for a record-setting $10,350.

And then...nothing. The year ended with virtually no important New Orleans eagles appearing at auction and this trend appears to be continuing into 2008. Having just reviewed the FUN offerings from Bowers and Merena, Heritage and Stack’s I noticed a virtual absence of any significant New Orleans eagles.

So where are all the coins and why are they not coming up for sale? These are good questions and while I do not have definitive answers, there are a few reasons that I suspect are the root cause.

The first is pretty obvious. Many New Orleans eagles (especially the No Motto issues) are very rare in high grades. When you are talking about a coin like an 1842-O eagle in properly graded Uncirculated, you are looking at an issue with maybe three or four known. Coins that are this rare do not trade with a great degree of frequency.

Especially when we look at reason number two. The New Orleans eagle market is still in its infancy in terms of development and the “players” in this market tend to be buyers at this point as opposed to sellers. This means that many of the really cool pieces that exist are in tightly-held collections and are not likely to be sold at any time soon.

Another not-so-obvious reason is what I call the “spillover effect.” New Orleans eagles have a number of specialized collectors and these individuals are often competing with Liberty Head eagle specialists when important coins come up for sale. I know of at least three collectors who are working on completing high grade sets of Liberty Head eagles. This means that if, for example, a high grade 1846-O eagle were to become available, the New Orleans eagle specialists would be duking it out with the Liberty Head eagle specialists (not to mention the generalists who like interesting coins) creating an unusual amount of competition.

One other reason for the lack of available coins has to do with poor price reporting. I would contend that a coin like the aforementioned high grade 1846-O eagle is worth a lot more today than it was in, say, 2003. But Trends and CDN Bid levels are essentially the same as they were five years ago. Since this very rare coin shows no “paper profit,” what motivation would its owner have to sell it unless he needed money? Until Trends and Bid show accurate values for coins such as high grade 1846-O eagles, the people who own them have no real motivation to sell.

There were a few other interesting New Orleans eagles that sold privately in 2007. I sold Condition Census examples of dates such as 1843-O, 1849-O, 1859-O, 1881-O, 1883-O, 1894-O and 1904-O. I would assume that some other pieces were sold by dealers who specialize in rare gold coins as well.

It will be interesting to see if these market conditions continue for New Orleans eagles in 2008 and beyond. I see a strong new level of demand for this denomination and expect some deep-pocketed new collectors to focus their attention on New Orleans eagles. I just wonder if they will be able to find enough coins to satisfy their hunger.

Coin Price Perspectives

If you ask ten knowledgeable people if coins are too cheap or too expensive, you’ll probably get ten different answers. I think certain coins are clearly too expensive but I think others are dirt cheap. Read on for my explanation. Coin prices depend a lot on perspective. I’ve been involved with coins since the 1970’s and in the market as a professional since the early 1980’s. I’ve seen markets go up and go down and watched the cycle repeat itself. As 2007 begins, I think there are certain coins that seem very pricey; primarily due to the fact that they’ve been promoted and that these promotions appear to have run out of steam.

Let me give you an example. Everyone knows that Indian Head quarter eagles have been brilliantly promoted for the last four or five years. During this period of time, the key issue, the 1911-D rose dramatically in price -as it should have. After all, hundreds of new collectors starting working on Indian Head quarter eagle sets and everyone needed a 1911-D.

When the Indian Head quarter eagle market was at its frothiest (in late 2005 to early 2006), an MS63 1911-D would have cost you around $30,000. When the Indian Head quarter eagle series was first being promoted, back in 2001, you could have bought a 1911-D in MS63 for $9,000-10,000. This coin tripled in value in five years and actually became somewhat more available during this time period due to relaxed grading standards. In retrospect, $9,000 for an MS63 1911-D seems pretty cheap while $30,000 for the same coin in MS63 seems pretty pricey. Or is it? If the promotion had continued for another five years, could the 1911-D risen to $50,000 or even $75,000 in MS63? My guess is that, yes, it could have (although I certainly wouldn’t have wanted to buy an MS63 1911-D quarter eagle for $50,000…)

Coin market observers (including, alas, myself) tend to think small and don’t often look at the big picture. The fact is that there is a tremendous amount of wealth in the United States right now and not a lot of places that wealthy individuals feel safe putting some of their excess cash.

If you follow the art market at all, you might have noticed that auction prices for Contemporary Art in the past few years have truly gone through the roof. It is not uncommon for good but not great examples of paintings by relatively good but not great Contemporary painters to sell for well over $1 million. In fact, in the upper echelon of the art world today, $1 million does not buy you very much at all.

We know who is buying many of these paintings. Hedge Fund managers and other successful Wall Street types have targeted Contemporary Art as their “Place To Make A Splash.” And why not when many of these individuals got $5 million, $10 million or even $20 million dollar bonuses this year? When you already own a killer apartment in Manhattan and a great weekend house in The Hamptons, what’s a million dollars here or there on a nice piece of art for the walls?

So what would happen if a small number of these Hedge Fund Superstars got interested in coins? They already have the perfect personality to be coin collectors and many of them probably dabbled with Lincoln Cents and Mercury Dimes when they were kids.

If you are brand new to the coin market and you have this kind of discretionary income, coins seem dirt cheap. Just the other day, I was talking to a client of mine about purchasing a major rarity in an upcoming auction. This is a true museum quality coin and one of the two or three finest known examples of an issue with probably less than a dozen known. To buy this coin, he’ll probably have to spend $125,000 or so. To you and me, that’s a lot of money. But to someone who sees “unspecial” paintings selling at Sotheby’s auction for $2.5 million+ this seems very cheap.

Clearly, these Hedge Fund guys will see their salaries come down to earth someday, possibly soon. But what if, in the meantime, a few of these guys started buying coins? And what if I told you a small but meaningful number of them already are?

The result of this, I suppose, will be an even further bifurcation of the market. The meat and potatoes coins that most of us buy and sell on a routine basis will go up and go down but shouldn’t be affected by Harry Hedge Fund’s foray into coins. But what about coins that are extremely rare or those with great stories or those which are finest known? My guess is that coins like this could get really expensive. Because, if you really think about it, the truly great coins out there actually are dirt cheap when you compare them to other collectibles.

Can You Determine a Market Trend From One Auction Result?

Can you determine a market trend from one auction result? A few mixed results from a recent coin auction caused a number of clients to call me and ask me this question. My answer(s) were that, in each case, I did not feel that changes in the market could be determined from these results. Let me be more specific. In the November 2006 Heritage sale there was an 1845-O quarter eagle in NGC AU53 offered as Lot 1937. If you’ve read any of my articles on New Orleans quarter eagles, you’ll know that I LOVE this date and almost always try to buy it. But this coin was an exception to the rule.

Although you couldn’t really see them in the Heritage online images, this 1845-O quarter eagle had some really detracting marks on the surfaces. They were the sort of marks that, eight out of ten times, NGC would have no-graded the coin in question for “damage.” Which was sort of a shame, as the coin, with the exception of the marks, was not bad looking. But I decided to pass on the coin as I though the marks made it too hard to sell.

The coin was reserved for somewhere in the $5,000 range which means that it could have been purchased for $5,750 including the 15% buyers charge. In my opinion, $5,750 for an AU53 1845-O quarter eagle is very reasonable. Except in this case.

After the sale, a client called me (one who owns a nice AU58 example of this date, by the way…) and asked me if the fact that this coin didn’t sale indicated a weakness in the market for 1845-O quarter eagles. I told him that I didn’t think so, given the fact that the coin in question was not very nice.

Another lot in the same sale provided another interesting test case. This was an 1879-O double eagle graded AU50 by NGC and it was Lot 2570.

If you follow New Orleans double eagle prices at all, you know that nearly any 1879-O that has been offered at auction in the past four or five years has sold for full Trends or, in many cases, considerably more. But the 1879-O in this sale sold for around 75-80% of Trends. Did this suggest, my client asked, that the market for this date was getting weak and could he finally buy one for a reasonable price?

I had viewed this coin in person and hated it. I thought it had zero eye appeal. It was not only overgraded, in my opinion, but it had some detracting spots as well. Apparently other bidders agreed with me as well as it brought at least $5,000 less than what a nice looking example would have.

Does this weak auction result mean that the market for 1879-O double eagles is tanking? Not in the least. Now, if this trend continues for the next two or three times that an 1879-O is offered, my opinion would change. Especially if any of the future coins that sell cheaply happen to be nice for the grade.

The bottom line is this: I do not think you can make any profound analysis about values decreasing (or increasing) for a specific issue based solely on a single transaction.

Numismatic Market Correction

I am seeing signs that we have been in the midst of a market correction in numismatics. Not a big correction, but a downturn in prices nonetheless. It is hard to say if this correction will continue for some time or if it is temporary. Looking at the history of the coin market and its continual swings up and down, I would say that the near-future of the market is a pretty tough call to make. (I still contend that the existence of the Internet makes the current coin market a completely different beast than the market that existed in the 1980’s and the early 1990’s.) But for the sake of argument, let’s say that prices are going to drop for awhile and that liquidity is not going to be as great as it has been for the last few years. What are the coins that are most likely to be adversely affected and which are most likely to be “safe?”

To be as simplistic as possible, the coins that do worst in a bad market are the worst coins. By this, I mean coins that are ugly or coins that are not rare or coins that are just plain uninteresting. Having lived through a number of bad markets myself, I can tell you that the last thing I will buy in this sort of market is an ugly coin that I know will sit around for months waiting for someone to buy it.

To be more specific, I think that some of the sort of coins that could be really hard to sell in a bad market include the following:

*Unappealing, scrubbed up examples of just about anything. Unless a coin is very rare or in great demand, coins that have zero originality and poor eye appeal are not going to be selling well.

*Unusual date gold coins. I’ve discussed these sorts of items before. Coins like 1895-S eagles. In a good market, coins like this are hard to sell. In a bad market, forget about it. Unless they are essentially priced as common dates (or at a huge discount relative to Trends), it is extremely hard to sell unusual date gold coins in a bad market.

*Boring coins. Try convincing someone to buy a common date Indian Head half eagle in MS62 when the market is crummy. Believe me, its hard enough when the market is good!

*High grade modern coins. The first people who disappear in a bad market are newbies and speculators; the two groups who buy most high grade modern coins.

*Coins that have been overpromoted. An example of this is Indian Head quarter eagles. These have been promoted now for well over five years. The promotion has been excellent and prices have risen a lot. At this point, one wonders how much more life this promotion has left.

*Overpriced coins. This is the most subjective category on this list and the hardest to accurately predict. I think most people will agree that High Reliefs are overpriced and that a correction is long overdue. But is a coin like a 1795 eagle overpriced? The market levels for this coin are at an all-time high but who wouldn’t want to own an example of this legendary issue?

What are the types of coins that are safest in a bad market? It doesn’t take a genius to figure out my answer: good coins. During really bad coin markets (like in the early 1990’s), really good coins dropped alot in price. People forget that as recently as 2000-2001, it was very hard to sell expensive coins and I can remember great coins like an 1808 Quarter Eagle in NGC MS63 sitting in my inventory for months and months before I could sell it (and only then at a small loss). But when the market does come back, really good coins come roaring back with a vengeance.

I would suggest that the following types of coins are less likely to get clobbered in a bad market:

*Anything with attractive original surfaces. I predict that in the next market cycle, people will pay huge premiums for gold coins that haven’t been stripped-n-dipped.

*Coins dated in the 1790’s. These coins are now well into their third century of existence and it is hard to not get excited by a gold coin that is this old.

*Key dates in popular series, especially if they are relatively affordable. I recently listed an 1847-O half eagle in PCGS AU50 on my website and was amazed that I got nine orders for the coin in less than a week.

*Coins with great historical backgrounds. A coin made during the Civil War or during the Gold Rush has a great story to tell and one that can be easily told.

*Coins with great pedigrees. In a bad market, the faux collectors and pseudo- dealers get pushed out and the people who really love coins get to have their day in the sun again. These people love the history behind their coins and they are willing to pay extra for a coin that has been owned by a great collector like Harry Bass or Louis Eliasberg.

One last piece of advice. Smart, long-term collectors love weakness (real or perceived) in markets. It’s a chance for them to take advantage of unsophisticated collectors (and dealers) who have no staying power and who panic at the first sign of weakness. I regularly talk to good customers of mine who remind me of certain great coins that we were able to acquire in the early part of this decade at very favorable prices because everyone else was scared to buy them.

Value Compression

An interesting recent trend in the rare gold coin market has been what I refer to as “value compression.” In years past, a small jump in a rare gold coin’s grade could mean an enormous jump in value. But the value jumps between certain grades are not nearly as great as they used to be. Why is this? I think the explanation is relatively simple. In the past, there used to be a lot of visual difference between, say, Extremely Fine-40 and Extremely Fine-45. And the difference between an Extremely Fine-40 and an About Uncirculated-50 coin was quite dramatic.

In today’s world, there often is virtually no aesthetic difference between an EF40 and an EF45 and, often times, an EF40 and an AU50 do not show all that much visual difference. As a result of this, the difference in values between the two levels has shrunken considerably. After all, why pay a premium price for something that does not appear to be tangibly “better?”

A perfect example of this is a common date Charlotte or Dahlonega half eagle in EF40 and AU50. In the past, you could expect to pay at least double—possibly even triple—for an AU50 as opposed to an EF40. As an example, if a nice Extremely Fine 1853-C half eagle was worth around $750-1,000 you could expect to pay around $1,500 to $2,000 for a nice quality AU coin.

Today, the value spread between these two grade ranges has compressed considerably. A nice EF 1853-C half eagle is a $2,500 coin while a solid AU is worth $3,250-3,500. What the market has realized is that there is not enough cosmetic difference between these grade levels to justify paying double or even triple for the higher graded coin.

In many cases I agree with this value compression. But I also think this compression of values has overreacted in some cases, leaving the higher grade coins very undervalued.

Let me give you an example. I recently sold a really nice 1853-C half eagle graded AU58 by NGC to a collector for $4,250. I thought I priced the coin a little on the cheap side but I like this collector a lot and wanted to pass onto him what I thought was a great purchase by me. If I owned a decent but nothing special EF45 example of this date, I would be able to sell it for $2,250 to $2,500. In my opinion, a very nice AU58 coin at around double the price of a decent EF45 is an extremely good value.

I can give you other examples of this but don’t want to beat a dead horse. My point is that with the current compression of values in the rare date gold market, there are some surprisingly good values in the AU55 and AU58 grades.

There are still numerous gold coins where a one point upgrade can mean tens of thousands of dollars in price difference. As an example, the price spread between a 1911-D and a 1915-S half eagle (to name just two) in MS64 to MS65 is well over $100,000. Think about that for a second…a measly one point increase can be the difference between, say, a $50,000 and a $150,000 coin. And the scariest part of that statement is that there are only about three people in the world who can actually tell the difference between an MS64 Indian Head half eagle and an MS65 (actually that’s a bit of an exaggeration…although not by much!).

Because of the demonstrable rarity of coins like a 1911-D or 1914-S half eagle in Gem Uncirculated, it is likely that such coins will always have a large premium over the next grade down. But how about for lower grade Uncirculated coins like MS61 and MS62?

My prediction is that we will see values further compress between the MS60 and MS61 and the MS61 and MS62 range very soon. In most cases, there just isn’t enough visual difference between, say, an MS60 1849-C quarter eagle and the same date in MS62 to justify the current Trends price jump from $25,000 (for an MS60) to $60,000 (for an MS62).

We are already seeing price compression in the AU58 to MS62 price range for small coins like gold dollars. As an example, an 1854-D gold dollar jumps from $15,000 in MS60 to just $20,000 in MS62. Why such a small jump? Because, the vast majority of slabbed MS62 examples of this date aren’t all that much better looking than MS60’s or MS61’s. On bigger coins, like eagles and double eagles, where the visual difference between MS60 and MS62 is more pronounced, it is likely that this price compression will not be as great.

Pricing MS61 Gold Coins

Coin World Trends lists prices for every Uncirculated grade between MS60 and MS65 with the exception of MS61. So, how does one go about figuring a price for a coin graded MS61 by PCGS or NGC? This depends on a numbers of factors: what is the price differential between MS60 and MS62? How rare is the coin in MS61 and in the grades above this? How strong a level of demand is there for the specific date in this grade? And, of course, you must consider that old favorite: what does the coin look like? In other words, is the fact that it’s in an MS61 holder make any difference regarding its appearance versus if it were graded MS60?

The obvious solution to pricing an MS61 would be to take the MS60 and MS62 Trends values for a coin, add them together and then divide this number in half. Let’s pick a coin and try this and see what happens.

I am going to randomly select an 1857-C half eagle in MS61 for this experiment. The Trends value of this coin is $10,000 in MS60 and $20,000 in MS62. Add these two numbers together and you get $30,000, divide this in half and you get $15,000. Assuming that this coin is worth around 70% of Trends, our formula states that this coin should have a retail value of around $10,500.

Now let’s go on the Heritage Auction Archives and see what the last few MS61 examples of this date have sold for at auction. Between January 1998 and the present date, this firm has sold three PCGS MS61 examples for $7,130, $7,188 and $8,912 respectively as well as an NGC example for $8,970. So much for our MS61 value formula and its premise that an MS61 1857-C half eagle should be worth $10,500.

So what is this coin worth? Well, in MS60 Trends is $10,000. Assuming an MS60 is worth 70% of Trends (and I think this figure is high, given the assumption that most MS60 Charlotte half eagles are not very nice coins from the standpoint of appearance), we can state that this coin is worth around $7,000 in MS60. Even though Trends jumps significantly in MS62, there are enough coins graded in MS60 and MS61 to satisfy the admittedly limited demand for this date. My feeling is that an MS61 example of this particular coin should only command a premium of 10-15%, giving it a fair retail value of around $7,700-8,050. And the market seems to agree with this, using the four action appearances cited above as reference points.

Now that we know this formula is a dud, what is a good way to determine the value of an MS61 rare date gold coin? As I mentioned above, there are a lot of factors at hand.

What if a coin has very little difference in rarity between an MS60 and an MS61? An example of this would be an 1887-S double eagle. Now this is a fairly scarce and fairly popular date in a very widely collected series. But it shows a current PCGS population of 39 coins in MS60 and 126 in MS61. The current Trends value for this date is $1,500 in MS60 and I would be a seller in the $1,100-1,300 range. I don’t think an MS61 would command much of a premium at all; possibly a few hundred dollars at most.

What’s an example where a one point increase from MS60 to MS61 could make a significant price increase? Let’s look at a rare coin in a popular series.

The 1856-O eagle is a truly rare coin in Uncirculated grades. PCGS has a population of just one coin in MS60 with none better while NGC shows a population of three in MS60 and none above this. There is no Trends value listed for this issue in MS60 while CDN Quarterly Bid is $13,500. I would be a very willing buyer of the PCGS MS60 example of this date for $15,000; possibly even more if I thought it were nice for the grade. But what would this issue be worth in MS61? Assuming that the coin was solid for the grade, I think it would be a $30,000+ item. Why the huge price increase between MS60 and MS61? It would be a finest known example of a truly rare coin in a series in which there are enthusiastic, deep-pocketed buyers.

I have suggested to the Editor of Coin World Trends that they eliminate the Fine-12 column for gold coins (a grade that many issues do not even exist in) and, instead, add values for the more popular and more often seen MS61 grade. But until this is actually done, the collector will have to use some creativity in determining what an MS61 is actually worth.